I'm not sure what got into me this afternoon, but I was talking with my friend at work about politics. Since I've been gone a week, we needed to catch up about McCain's VP choice, but for some reason my emotions were just raw. I got a little upset, more than I should have gotten while at work and more than I needed to with my friend. But it happened and suddenly I was tearing up and railing about my fears. Luckily it was almost time to go home, and I got in touch with my friend Sharon, and she let me be incoherent to her.
All of this made me think about the emails I sent out the days after the last two presidential elections. The second I reprinted here, about two years ago, and is about Federalist X and I feel more poignantly now what I wrote then, especially about the balances of power.
I'm not going to pour out my incoherent thoughts, because I don't think doing so would make me feel any better. Instead I'm going to point you to some pieces friends have sent me.
If you read nothing else, read Frank Rich's piece from Sunday's NYT. He's been on a roll lately. He goes on to talk about how McCain's trademark haste would prove problematic in the White House, but this early paragraph hits as to what I'm truly angry about.
My friend Sharon sent me a NYT blog post by Judith Warner that touches again on Palin, the GOP's disdain for the citizenry of this land and America's obsession with "connecting" with the candidate. Below, another quote I liked.
Could there be a more thoroughgoing humiliation for America’s women?
Finally, my ever politically astute friend Aimee, who wrote her thesis in college about women in politics, sent me Anna Quindlen's piece on the GOP' "finding" feminism, of course when it's convenient. She starts off with a killer GB Shaw quote, "Hypocrisy is only bad when it is improperly used."
Again, a quote.
I'm tired of the hypocrisy and the lies, and it has already been a long campaign season. Tomorrow I promise some Montana stories.
Claire, getting emotional about the political quagmire and the policies that represent us, the US, to the world strikes me as the only sensible response. True, some stalwarts (those with psyches far stronger than mine) need to fight idiocy and reason. You, from what I can tell, might be one of those people. But who could fully understand what's at stake without moments of hysteria--one of Freud's famous labels for women's inadequacy, but that guy grows more obsolete by the minute.
Bty, I did mention you & your sister to my son, who is so peculiar that he claimed to be disinterested in any pre-arranged meeting with his mom's blogger friend and her sister. Where did I go wrong?
Posted by: Kathleen | September 08, 2008 at 10:16 PM
Whoa: I meant, of course, need to fight idiocy WITH reason.
Posted by: Kathleen | September 08, 2008 at 10:19 PM
Claire- you're so right. Rich has been on a roll. I also so vividly remember your the earlier posts you mentioned. They should be reprinted/reposted again!!
I think anyone concerned about the state of politics and how people go about winning should read this. The deregulation of the media has done so much harm.
Posted by: Jennifer | September 09, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Not "your the"... I was typing too fast and nodding too much with all you wrote.
Posted by: Jennifer | September 09, 2008 at 11:51 AM